<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Colors and a Theorem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foxmath.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/four-colors-and-a-theorem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foxmath.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/four-colors-and-a-theorem/</link>
	<description>Musings of a Non-linear Operator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abhinav Maurya</title>
		<link>http://foxmath.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/four-colors-and-a-theorem/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhinav Maurya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxmath.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Nice read. I&#039;ve just read a proof for five colors... quite simple. Your post formulates the problem for four colors in a nice manner. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice read. I&#8217;ve just read a proof for five colors&#8230; quite simple. Your post formulates the problem for four colors in a nice manner. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Labarque</title>
		<link>http://foxmath.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/four-colors-and-a-theorem/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Labarque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxmath.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Since 2008/08/23 I put a 3rd version of a &quot;Blueprint for a classic proof of the four colour theorem&quot; on http://arXiv.org/abs/0802.1535
Is it NOT ok? 
or 
Is it possible to use it for a more rigid mathematical proof? 
But I don&#039;t got affirmative answers to the 1st or 2nd question.

Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since 2008/08/23 I put a 3rd version of a &#8220;Blueprint for a classic proof of the four colour theorem&#8221; on <a href="http://arXiv.org/abs/0802.1535" rel="nofollow">http://arXiv.org/abs/0802.1535</a><br />
Is it NOT ok?<br />
or<br />
Is it possible to use it for a more rigid mathematical proof?<br />
But I don&#8217;t got affirmative answers to the 1st or 2nd question.</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~owl~</title>
		<link>http://foxmath.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/four-colors-and-a-theorem/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>~owl~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxmath.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-177</guid>
		<description>the graph representation of the lower 48 United States (47, actually. I think I lost one somewhere…)

looks like something to  do with Delaware and New Jersey ....

~owl~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the graph representation of the lower 48 United States (47, actually. I think I lost one somewhere…)</p>
<p>looks like something to  do with Delaware and New Jersey &#8230;.</p>
<p>~owl~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
